feed >> tacoma
Home Events Discuss Shops Photos

Tacoma Urbanist

Feb. 7, 2008 at 12:22am

Seattle Seeks Again to Merge With Port of Tacoma


Today, the former Port of Seattle Commissioner wrote a strong op-ed piece in the Seattle Times attempting to influence lawmakers to merge the troubled Port of Seattle with the increasingly successful Port of Tacoma.  Here, the former port commisions decry the competitive nature of the ports in "race to the bottom" type arguments:

Competition between the ports has served only to decrease each port's rental income and add costs for marketing and tenant inducements, which benefit shippers and terminal operators only and in no way increase our region's revenues, employment, cargo or trade.

(Question: would former Seattle Port Commissioners have requested a merge if Seattle was beating Tacoma's port?). 

The former Seattle Port Commissioners omit two important issues.  First, that the Port of Seattle is undergoing a ciminal investigation.  Second, that the decrease in the rental income is only for the Port of Seattle which has been losing business to the Port of Tacoma.

The opinion piece then makes a socialistic form of a plea for the ports to merge to stop the perceived tragedy  "competition" between them:

That said, the ports of Puget Sound will never be able to effectively compete until the existing self-defeating competition is brought to an end.

Commentary:

The Port of Tacoma is "meaningfully competing" thank you very much.

With that said, the invitation to end the "self-defeating competition" between Seattle and Tacoma is a good one.  I think the proposal by the former port commissioners should taken seriously so long as Seattle first, as a sign of good faith takes the following steps:

1) Takes back its share of felons they have placed in Tacoma.

2) Returns our law school they took from Tacoma in year 2000 so that Seattle and Tacoma each have one (that's fair isn't it?).







3) Split the number of office buildings being built between the two cities in the last 5 years.

4) Require Paul Allen to spilt the investment between Seattle and Tacoma.


Tacomans are a reasonable people and may consider accepting Seattle's offer to end such "self-defeating competition," but only in a comprehensive manner, not just the ones Seattle is losing in.

comments [5]  |  posted under tacoma, washington
Comments

by droid116
on 2/7/2008 @ 9:51am
In two of the points that outline for the merger, they first state that the COMBINED ports (which may include others) should have a commission of 9 people.

Then, just a few paragraphs later, they say how one of the governance problems is generated from too small of a commission for each port, 5 each.

It just strikes me that more than doubling the complexity of the operations, then reducing the combined number of commissioners by 1 creates conflict within their own arguments.

What's the chance that they would push for an even allotment of commissioners if it ever did happen? Pretty darn low.

Maybe they should base it on the number of containers that move through the respective ports.

by Nick
on 2/7/2008 @ 10:33am
"Tacomans are a reasonable people and may consider accepting Seattle's offer to end such "self-defeating competition," but only in a comprehensive manner, not just the ones Seattle is losing in."

I can't deny I had a little chuckle when I read that. It was perfect, pure gold! :-)

by Erik
on 2/7/2008 @ 11:33am
I can't deny I had a little chuckle when I read that. It was perfect, pure gold!

Thanks. Glad you enjoyed it.

I wonder if the Legislature would allow a citizen to play South 5 video in the public comment period.

If South 5 were a series, the port issue would be a good episode.


by Erik
on 2/7/2008 @ 11:35am
What's the chance that they would push for an even allotment of commissioners if it ever did happen? Pretty darn low.

The proposal I saw to merge the Everett, Seattle and Tacoma Port would give Tacoma area residents a small voice indeed in the running of the operations.

The Port of Seattle's throngs of problems will probably save the Port of Tacoma for while from being swallowed by Seattle, but it will more of a challenge in the long run.


by droid116
on 2/7/2008 @ 11:39am
The Chihuligan emerging from the fog (do we have fog at the POT) to meet with the other members surrounded by stacked cargo containers sounds like a money shot for a South 5 episode.
Post Reply:

Email *

Password *

   Remember me on this computer

OR

Sign Me Up!

About

A ongoing conversation to make Tacoma a better to live and work through better urban design.

See my Downtown and Neighborhood Pictures

-Erik B.

Most Popular Posts:

1. Tacoma Coffee Shop Showdown

2. Traffic Calming Portland Style (by painting intersections)

3. Tacoma's Relevance to Presidential Election 2008

4. Daniel Blue and RR Anderson

5. Tacoma Document Archive - Key City Documents, Court Documents, Links, Books, and Videos.

6. Is your city worth caring about? James Kunstler discusses how to make your community a place worth caring about.

Useful Links

Tacoma Streetcars - Join the citywide effort to restore streetcars to Tacoma's Neighborhoods.

Congress for New Urbanism - the leading organization promoting walkable, neighborhood-based development as an alternative to sprawl.

Planetizen - A one-stop source for urban planning news, commentary and interviews.

New Urban News - Discussing traditional neighborhood development focusing on building mixed-use, walkable neighborhoods instead of conventional suburban subdivisions, shopping centers and office parks.

Recent Posts