May. 17, 2011 at 12:01am
After considering the matter at length, reading studies in the matter and receiving extensive public comment (almost exclusively against digital billboards), the Tacoma Planning Commission took a strong stance against the threat of digital billboards being forced into the City of Tacoma:
Here is the Tacoma Planning Commission letter to the Tacoma City Council (page 17):
"[t]he Commission Emphatically Urges the Council to say no to digital billboards. Nearly 350 community members spoke against allowing this form of signage in our city. We understand the Council's reluctance for prolonged litigation and the laudable goal of ultimately reducing visual blight from existing billboards by instituting an exchange program, but the price to do so, as outlined in the settlement agreement, is too high."
"The departure from this policy...would not only eliminate the amoratization provision but would also allow for new billboards that are digital, larger, and in areas where they have long been prohibited--does not mesh with the Commission's understanding of Tacoma's long-term vision to become a more attractive and liveable city."
"We therefore are recommending that the sign code maintain the current limitations on traditional billboards and clearly prohibit digital billboards anywhere in the city."
Now it is the time for the Council to do the right thing and follow the advice of Tacoma residents & the Planning Commission for the betterment of the city and ban blightful digital billboards as many other cities have!
Where: City Council Chambers 747 Market St Tacoma, WA
comments  | posted under tacomaComments
by Erik on 5/17/2011 @ 1:09am
|From attorney Doug Shafer via the Tribune comments:|
Doug Schafer says:
May 16, 2011 at 9:00 pm
It appears our city manager (hired in mid-2005) decided in mid-2007 not to oppose Clear Channel's lawsuit challenging our 1997 city council's billboard ordinance, but decided instead to negotiate and compromise with Clear Channel.
I am convinced, having carefully analyzed Clear Channel's court pleadings, that the city could have won that lawsuit quickly at little cost if it had engaged a capable lawyer to aggressively oppose Clear Channel.
I explain why in my memorandum dated 5-13-2011 posted at cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billb... near the bottom of that webpage just above the summary of relevant court cases.
The city now should withdraw its settlement offer (that Clear Channel has never signed) and should begin enforcing our 1997 billboard ordinance. If Clear Channel files another lawsuit, the city should hire a capable lawyer to aggressively seek an early dismissal of that lawsuit.
by L.S.Erhardt on 5/17/2011 @ 1:24am
|Either the city council is afraid, lazy or someone owns stock in Clear Channel. All three are unacceptable, and one might be criminal.
Either way, the council better stand up to this or there will be hell to pay at the ballot box.
by NineInchNachos on 5/17/2011 @ 1:31am
|we're seeing crazy conservatives and crazy liberals in the TNT threads in unanimous agreement on billboards. The love of blue sky, the love of seeing stars at night is truly a force to unify all people.|
by Erik on 5/17/2011 @ 1:36am
|Here is another legal analysis from former Pierce County Prosecutor and former Tacoma City Councilmember John Ladenburg, Sr:|
"Please oppose the video billboard proposal, it would be a terrible blight on Tacoma. This is a bad settlement and you should reject it and continue to fight to clean up Tacoma."
@RR: Yes. I have never ever seen Tacomans so universally lined up on one side of an issue.
Nor have I seen Tacoma threatened with so much blight in a single vote.
Tacoma Planning Commission members deserve a dozen golden City of Destiny medals for their valor in calling out the destructive proposals.
@Thorax: imposing 24/7 commercial spam producing digital billboard on Tacomans would be perceived to be unconscionable to a very large majority of Tacomans. Yes, a difficult political plank to run on.
by NineInchNachos on 5/17/2011 @ 1:43am
|interesting exchange on bookface... |
Mark Lindquist to Matt Driscoll:
RR keeps asking me - and everyone else - to boycott the Volcano. I finally responded, "RR, it would not be ethical for me to boycott a weekly alternative paper that featured a Mark Lindquist mask on their cover. What kind of ingrate would do that? Wyatt James would not.
Matt Driscoll to Mark Lindquist:
Yeah, he's pretty enraged (engorged?) about the Clear Channel situation. And I can sympathize (and even get behind) that. It's not like anyone at the Volcano wants Tacoma to be full of hideous digital billboards. I'm not exactly sure why he's directing so much wrath at us (other than the obvious: our insanely well-crafted "Get In on the Party" billboards are much easier to target than Humane Society, Click! or "Don't Beat Up Old People" billboards), but hopefully it works ... if the end goal is to make sure Clear Channel doesn't strong-arm Tacoma into a future full of flashing advertisements on every neighborhood corner. If the end goal is just to make our lives miserable or persuade us to drop our billboards it seems a little misguided, but that's just me. Best case scenario: the Tacoma City Council and the highly paid official they've hired on behalf of the people do their job and don't just wilt for fear of "expensive litigation." You stop getting messages from RR. And we can once again use Facebook again in peace. The desires of companies, no matter how massive, should not trump the desires of whole cities. Guess we'll see what happens ...
by cisserosmiley on 5/17/2011 @ 7:08am
|wow, mr matt driscoll makes the volcano sound like the "tnt" 3 or 4 years ago...this was on the eve of the great "tnt" boycott that resulted in the near dismantling of McClatchy's tacoma operation. will the volcano survive? what will we all do without the weakling barf?|
by Mofo from the Hood on 5/17/2011 @ 7:25am
|"The desires of companies, no matter how massive, should not trump the desires of whole cities."---@1:43am|
Why not? Maybe Clear Channel doesn't see this as a conflict of competing desires. For them it's about their business reason conflicting with the desire of a small group of Tacoman's. Reason vs. Desire. Economic Reality vs. Feelings.
by Jesse on 5/17/2011 @ 7:52am
|"Here is another legal analysis from former Pierce County Prosecutor and former Tacoma City Councilmember John Ladenburg, Sr:"|
"Please oppose the video billboard proposal, it would be a terrible blight on Tacoma. This is a bad settlement and you should reject it and continue to fight to clean up Tacoma." --- John Ladenberg
Ladenberg Law advertises on a digital billboard on the north(?) side of I-5 as you are leaving Fife toward King County. Saw it with my own eyes yesterday... and laughed.
by jenyum on 5/17/2011 @ 7:55am
|How does one boycott a free paper anyway? What if one needs something in which to wrap one's fragile items?|
by fredo on 5/17/2011 @ 8:00am
|That youtube posted by the urbanist is quite remarkable. I hope everyone will take 6 minutes out of their day to listen to it.|
by cisserosmiley on 5/17/2011 @ 8:10am
|hey jesse...i am sure the ladenbergs will dismiss this indescretion as ancillary...and since it takes place on tribal boards it is O.K.???|
by NineInchNachos on 5/17/2011 @ 8:11am
by Mofo from the Hood on 5/17/2011 @ 8:46am
|Well I suppose the issue is this:|
Are billboards educators or corruptors of society?
Do they clarify or mystify the mind of the viewer?
Maybe billboards are just man-made images, extensions of his authenticity, that provoke people to project their feelings---Billboards present Art now. Billboards for billboards sake. If that's the case then maybe billboards should be banned because they're emotionally exhausting and lead to mass confusion and skepticism about whether the true nature of reality can be known and how man should conduct himself.
by NineInchNachos on 5/17/2011 @ 8:49am
|excellent youtube. Thanks Fredo.
by NineInchNachos on 5/17/2011 @ 8:54am
|Beyond the Billboard is there a world you long to see?
Then join in the fight that will give you the right to be free!
by Nick on 5/17/2011 @ 9:43am
|Heh, I'd love to see someone walk up to the podium tonight and just flip open their laptop and play that Kevin Fry video. I know its over 5 minutes, but not by much :-D|
.... actually, NiN's link would probably do the trick in much less time.
by Nick on 5/17/2011 @ 9:45am
|I caught a sneak preview of the video ClearChannel will be presenting to the council tonight:|
by KevinFreitas on 5/17/2011 @ 12:12pm
|Here's the note I just sent to the Mayor and City Council since I can't attend tonight's meeting due to illness:|
I fully support the moratorium proposed in this ordinance and appreciate the thoughtful approach this body along with the Planning Commission is taking in considering the issue of billboards in Tacoma.
by Erik on 5/17/2011 @ 1:09pm
|Great email Kevin.
Keep the fine meter alive!
A ongoing conversation to make Tacoma a better to live and work through better urban design.
See my downtown Tacoma and neighborhood pictures of coffee, food, people, art, urban blight and Frost Park Chalk Off events.
Watch Mayor Marilyn Strickland deliver Tacoma's first State of the City Address.